Leading the regional supply of premium construction aggregates through our high capacity, strategically located quarrying operations.
Premier dolerite quarry operation serving major infrastructure and construction projects across Mpumalanga and Gauteng. Known for consistent quality, daily testing protocols, and reliable supply.
Annual Production Capacity
Botswana’s largest aggregate quarry by volume, serving Gaborone’s construction, brick manufacturing, and ready-mix concrete markets. Known for 4,000 tonnes daily capacity, custom sizing capabilities, and comprehensive supply to major contractors within the Greater Gaborone.
Annual Production Capacity
Is operational on the Morgenzon Road, supplying high-quality aggregates to regional infrastructure, construction, and mining projects. The operation utilizes integrated expertise in drill and blast, mobile crushing, and quarry management to meet regional demand. The site operates in line with strict environmental, health, and safety standards, ensuring responsible resource management and production efficiency.
Represented locally by Jason Southey, who has over six years of experience in the region. With a background in supplying concrete and masonry products to both the public and private sectors, he serves as the primary contact for contractors and developers, ensuring responsive service delivery and dependable aggregate supply.
Beyond material supply, we provide complete end-to-end quarry services to meet your specific project requirements.
Our integrated logistics network ensures timely delivery of materials to your project site. With both rail and road transport capabilities, we can accommodate projects of any size and location.
Road and rail transport options with dedicated delivery schedules
Regular delivery schedules aligned with your project timeline
Customer support available Monday to Friday
Delivery Trucks
On time delivery
Available Monday to Friday
Get reliable access to high‑quality materials with exceptional service and competitive pricing
Plant ownership feels like operational control. In practice, for a significant number of South African mining and quarry operations, it becomes one of the most expensive decisions on the books.
Contract crushing offers a structured alternative. In the current capital environment across Gauteng and broader South Africa, it is the model that an increasing number of experienced operations managers are selecting. This post sets out the considerations you need to evaluate before committing either way.
Plant ownership means your operation purchases, commissions, staffs, and maintains the crushing and screening plant. The asset sits on your balance sheet. The operational risk sits with your team.
Contract crushing is a service arrangement in which a specialist contractor supplies a fully equipped crushing and screening plant, operates it with qualified personnel, and maintains it throughout the contract period. Your operation pays for tonnes produced. The contractor carries the equipment, the technical expertise, and the mechanical risk.
Both models produce crushed aggregate. The difference lies in who carries the cost, the risk, and the management burden of getting there.
The purchase price of a crushing plant is the most visible cost. It is rarely the largest one over a project lifetime.
Capital costs (CAPEX) to account for at the outset:
Ongoing operational costs (OPEX) that accumulate throughout the project:
For a mid-range crushing plant operating between 150 and 250 tph, the total cost of ownership over a five-year period, when downtime losses are properly accounted for, consistently exceeds the original CAPEX figure by a material margin. This is not a theoretical observation. It is what the operational data shows.
Under a properly structured contract crushing arrangement, the cost model changes fundamentally.
In place of unpredictable CAPEX and variable OPEX, the operation works to a structured cost-per-tonne or monthly operational rate. Within that rate, the following are covered by the contractor:
The result is a predictable, budgetable cost directly tied to tonnes produced. When the plant is not producing, the operation’s cost exposure is contained. When production requirements increase, the contractor scales accordingly.
| Factor | Plant Ownership | Contract Crushing |
|---|---|---|
| Initial capital outlay | High — significant CAPEX commitment | Low to zero upfront capital requirement |
| Operational cost predictability | Variable — subject to unplanned maintenance events | Fixed or structured rate against production |
| Downtime risk | Carried entirely by the operation | Carried by the contractor |
| Capacity flexibility | Limited by the fixed asset configuration | Adjustable — contractor scales to production requirements |
| Technical expertise | Requires qualified in-house recruitment | Included within the service arrangement |
| Wear parts management | Operation’s responsibility and procurement burden | Contractor’s responsibility |
| Balance sheet treatment | Asset recorded on the operation’s books | Treated as OPEX — capital remains available |
| Mobilisation for remote projects | Complex, costly, and time-consuming | Contractor manages full deployment logistics |
Ownership is not the wrong answer in every scenario. It is the appropriate choice when the following conditions are genuinely met:
Where any of those conditions are uncertain or subject to change, the ownership argument weakens considerably.
Contract crushing consistently delivers better value than ownership across the following scenarios.
Projects with a defined production timeline.
Construction and infrastructure projects, mining contracts, and quarry expansions operating over a two to five year window rarely justify the CAPEX of full plant ownership. A contract crushing arrangement delivers production from mobilisation without tying up capital in a depreciating asset.
Operations requiring rapid production ramp-up.
When a new mining contract is awarded or an infrastructure project demands immediate aggregate supply, an in-house plant that is not yet commissioned, or is undersized for the requirement, cannot respond. A contractor operating across the 50 to 500 tph range can match plant configuration to the production obligation from the outset.
Remote and cross-border project locations.
Deploying and maintaining owned crushing equipment at remote sites in Limpopo, Mpumalanga, or cross-border locations including Namibia, Botswana, or Mozambique introduces logistical and maintenance complexity that specialist contractors are specifically structured to manage.
Operations where capital preservation is a priority.
Releasing CAPEX from equipment ownership allows that capital to be directed towards the activities that generate the operation’s core margin: mining, processing, and project delivery.
Not all contract crushing services operate to the same standard. A procurement evaluation should examine the following before any contract is awarded.
B&E International, a member of the Raubex Group (JSE: RBX), delivers integrated crushing and screening solutions to mining, quarrying, and construction operations across Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Limpopo, and throughout Southern Africa.
Operating from our Kempton Park base on the East Rand, our teams deploy crushing and screening plants across the 50 to 500 tph range, configured to your material specification, product requirement, and project timeline. Our operators are qualified, our maintenance programmes are structured, and our production reporting is transparent.
We carry the plant. We carry the technical expertise. Your operation carries the output.
If you are evaluating contract crushing against plant ownership for an upcoming project, the time to have that conversation is before capital decisions are made.
Our team will assess your throughput requirements, project timeline, and material specification, and provide an honest evaluation of what each model will cost your operation in practice.