Delivering Large-Scale Projects Across Africa

Showcasing our expertise through successful project delivery across diverse mining operations

Featured Projects

Explore our portfolio of successful mining and engineering projects across Sub-Saharan Africa.

Namdeb Coastal Operations

Coastal earthworks, production stripping, and beach accretion. We construct and maintain high specification seawalls, allowing the client safe access to their coastal resources. in Oranjemund.

Kusile Aggregate Supply​

15 million tons of high specification construction aggregate from Howard Quarry to support the foundational build of this massive energy infrastructure project.

Mozambique LNG Project​​

Expansion and upgrade of existing copper processing facilities, including new flotation circuits, thickeners, and tailings management systems.

Tschudi Copper Mine Operations

A landmark B.O.O.T (Build, Own, Operate, and Transfer) project encompassing the full lifecycle of a 2.1 Million Tonne per Year processing facility.

Ready to Start Your Next Project?

Let’s discuss how our proven track record can ensure your project’s success.

Namdeb Coastal Mining Operations

Coastal Mining Services | Oranjemund, Namibia

B&E International provides critical contracted mining services to Namdeb’s Southern Coastal Mines in Oranjemund, Namibia. Awarded a major 60-month fixed-term contract in March 2023, B&E is a strategic partner in Namdeb’s long-term operational strategy, delivering specialized services that are essential to securing Namibia’s diamond-rich coastal gravels.

This project is a cornerstone of Namdeb’s “Life of Mine” (LOM) extension. B&E International’s role involves large-scale earthworks and specialized coastal engineering designed to push back the Atlantic shoreline and protect active mining sites from the extreme marine environment.

Project Overview

Scope of Work

  • Production Stripping: Providing comprehensive mining services including production and “Beach Accretion” stripping to advance the shoreline.

  • Seawall Construction: Building and maintaining high-specification seawalls to safeguard mining operations from Atlantic storm surges.

  • Performance Metric: Managing high-volume operations with the capacity to load and haul approximately 2.7 million tonnes of sand monthly.

  • Strategic Impact: Supporting 213 permanent jobs and providing the infrastructure necessary to extend the Life of Mine.

Technical Capabilities Utilised

  • Coastal Mining Support: Advanced beach accretion and overburden stripping in high-energy marine environments.

  • High-Volume Earthmoving: Large-scale loading and hauling operations exceeding 2.7 million tonnes per month.

  • Marine Infrastructure Engineering: Construction of specialized seawalls for coastal protection.

  • Contract Mining Services: Integrated site establishment, operational support, and long-term project management.

Kusile Power Station

Commercial Aggregate Supply and Crushing Services | eMalahleni & Balmoral, Mpumalanga

B&E International’s involvement in the Mpumalanga energy corridor began as a strategic partner for the Kusile Power Station construction. From 2011 to 2016, B&E established and operated the dedicated Kusile Quarry on-site, supplying the foundational material for one of the world’s largest coal-fired plants. Upon the completion of this primary phase, operations transitioned to Howard Quarry (Balmoral), evolving from a project-specific site into a high-capacity commercial hub serving the broader regional infrastructure market.

Project Overview

Scope of Work

B&E International was responsible for:

  • Primary Build Supply: Delivered 5,5 million tons of high-spec construction aggregate specifically engineered for the Kusile Power Station’s foundational and civil works.

  • Strategic Transition: Successfully migrated operations from a dedicated on-site project quarry to the permanent commercial facility at Balmoral (Howard Quarry).

  • Current Operations: Managing high-efficiency crushing and screening systems to maintain a consistent 850k ton annual capacity for the regional market.

  • Infrastructure Support: Providing ongoing bulk material supply and logistics for large-scale civil works across the Mpumalanga province.

Technical Capabilities Utilised

  • Deployment of high-output mobile and static crushing systems for massive-scale projects.

  • Specialized material grading to meet stringent Eskom and international engineering specifications.

  • Expert management of large-scale site establishment and multi-year project transitions.

  • Continuous high-volume production planning and preventative plant maintenance.

Mozambique LNG Project

Aggregate and Coastal Construction Materials Supply | Afungi and Pemba, Cabo Delgado Province, Mozambique

B&E International is a primary supply chain partner for the Mozambique LNG development, providing high-grade crushed aggregates and sea defense materials. Following the lift of Force Majeure in mid-February 2026, operations have ramped up to full-scale production to meet the project’s infrastructure restart requirements.

Operating from Pemba, B&E ensures the consistent delivery of specialized materials for heavy infrastructure and coastal protection. With the development approximately 40% complete and first production targeted for 2029, B&E’s resilient production systems remain pivotal to the regional supply chain.

Project Overview

Scope of Work

Technical Capabilities Utilised

Tschudi Copper Mine Operations

Crushing, Agglomeration and Mineral Processing Services | Near Tsumeb, Oshikoto Region, Namibia

B&E International was awarded a build, own and operate contract for the crushing, agglomeration and stacking plant at the Tschudi Copper Mine located approximately 20 kilometres west of Tsumeb in Namibia’s Oshikoto Region. The contract was awarded during the development phase of the project under the ownership of Weatherly International.

The Tschudi Copper Mine is an open pit operation utilising heap leach, solvent extraction and electrowinning technology to produce London Metal Exchange Grade A copper cathode. The plant has a design capacity of approximately 17,000 tonnes per annum of copper cathode. Following a period of care and maintenance, the operation was restarted under new ownership in 2024 and has returned to active production.

Project Overview

Scope of Work​

Under the Build, Own, Operate and  Transfer model, B&E International was responsible for:

  • Design and construction of primary, secondary and tertiary crushing circuits

  • Installation of agglomeration systems and stacking infrastructure

  • Operation and maintenance of the crushing and material handling plant

  • Management of ore preparation for heap leach processing

  • Integration of crushing output into the solvent extraction and electrowinning recovery circuit

Technical Capabilities Utilised

  • Mineral processing plant engineering and design

  • Crushing and screening system deployment

  • Agglomeration and heap leach stacking infrastructure

  • Copper sector plant operations expertise

  • Long term plant maintenance and operational management systems

Contract Crushing vs. Owning Your Own Plant: A Strategic Evaluation

Plant ownership feels like operational control. In practice, for a significant number of South African mining and quarry operations, it becomes one of the most expensive decisions on the books.

Contract crushing offers a structured alternative. In the current capital environment across Gauteng and broader South Africa, it is the model that an increasing number of experienced operations managers are selecting. This post sets out the considerations you need to evaluate before committing either way.

Understanding the Two Models

Plant ownership means your operation purchases, commissions, staffs, and maintains the crushing and screening plant. The asset sits on your balance sheet. The operational risk sits with your team.

Contract crushing is a service arrangement in which a specialist contractor supplies a fully equipped crushing and screening plant, operates it with qualified personnel, and maintains it throughout the contract period. Your operation pays for tonnes produced. The contractor carries the equipment, the technical expertise, and the mechanical risk.

Both models produce crushed aggregate. The difference lies in who carries the cost, the risk, and the management burden of getting there.

The Full Cost of Plant Ownership in South Africa

The purchase price of a crushing plant is the most visible cost. It is rarely the largest one over a project lifetime.

Capital costs (CAPEX) to account for at the outset:

  • Primary, secondary, and tertiary crusher units
  • Vibrating screens and classification equipment
  • Conveyor infrastructure, feed hoppers, and transfer points
  • Electrical installation, control systems, and instrumentation
  • Civil works, plant footprint preparation, and site establishment
  • Commissioning, calibration, and initial production trials

Ongoing operational costs (OPEX) that accumulate throughout the project:

  • Manganese liners, screen media, blow bars, and other wear components
  • Specialist maintenance labour and technical callout costs
  • Spare parts inventory, with lead times on imported components typically running between four and twelve weeks
  • Unplanned downtime losses, which in a production environment translate directly to revenue shortfall
  • Plant insurance, depreciation, and asset management administration
  • Operator wages, supervisory structure, and shift compliance costs

For a mid-range crushing plant operating between 150 and 250 tph, the total cost of ownership over a five-year period, when downtime losses are properly accounted for, consistently exceeds the original CAPEX figure by a material margin. This is not a theoretical observation. It is what the operational data shows.

What a Contract Crushing Arrangement Covers

Under a properly structured contract crushing arrangement, the cost model changes fundamentally.

In place of unpredictable CAPEX and variable OPEX, the operation works to a structured cost-per-tonne or monthly operational rate. Within that rate, the following are covered by the contractor:

  • Full plant supply and mobilisation to site
  • Qualified plant operators and on-site supervision
  • Scheduled and breakdown maintenance
  • Wear parts procurement and replacement management
  • Production reporting and throughput tracking against agreed targets

The result is a predictable, budgetable cost directly tied to tonnes produced. When the plant is not producing, the operation’s cost exposure is contained. When production requirements increase, the contractor scales accordingly.

A Direct Comparison Across Key Operational Factors

FactorPlant OwnershipContract Crushing
Initial capital outlayHigh — significant CAPEX commitmentLow to zero upfront capital requirement
Operational cost predictabilityVariable — subject to unplanned maintenance eventsFixed or structured rate against production
Downtime riskCarried entirely by the operationCarried by the contractor
Capacity flexibilityLimited by the fixed asset configurationAdjustable — contractor scales to production requirements
Technical expertiseRequires qualified in-house recruitmentIncluded within the service arrangement
Wear parts managementOperation’s responsibility and procurement burdenContractor’s responsibility
Balance sheet treatmentAsset recorded on the operation’s booksTreated as OPEX — capital remains available
Mobilisation for remote projectsComplex, costly, and time-consumingContractor manages full deployment logistics

When Plant Ownership Is the Appropriate Choice

Ownership is not the wrong answer in every scenario. It is the appropriate choice when the following conditions are genuinely met:

  • Crushing volumes are consistently high and reliably predictable across a project life of ten years or more
  • The operation has the internal technical capacity to maintain and manage the plant to the required standard
  • The site location is fixed and stable, with no prospect of relocation or significant production profile change
  • The operation’s capital structure can carry the asset without placing strain on working capital or constraining other investment priorities

Where any of those conditions are uncertain or subject to change, the ownership argument weakens considerably.

When Contract Crushing Is the Stronger Operational Choice

Contract crushing consistently delivers better value than ownership across the following scenarios.

Projects with a defined production timeline.
Construction and infrastructure projects, mining contracts, and quarry expansions operating over a two to five year window rarely justify the CAPEX of full plant ownership. A contract crushing arrangement delivers production from mobilisation without tying up capital in a depreciating asset.

Operations requiring rapid production ramp-up.
When a new mining contract is awarded or an infrastructure project demands immediate aggregate supply, an in-house plant that is not yet commissioned, or is undersized for the requirement, cannot respond. A contractor operating across the 50 to 500 tph range can match plant configuration to the production obligation from the outset.

Remote and cross-border project locations.
Deploying and maintaining owned crushing equipment at remote sites in Limpopo, Mpumalanga, or cross-border locations including Namibia, Botswana, or Mozambique introduces logistical and maintenance complexity that specialist contractors are specifically structured to manage.

Operations where capital preservation is a priority.
Releasing CAPEX from equipment ownership allows that capital to be directed towards the activities that generate the operation’s core margin: mining, processing, and project delivery.

What to Evaluate in a Contract Crushing Contractor

Not all contract crushing services operate to the same standard. A procurement evaluation should examine the following before any contract is awarded.

  • Throughput capacity range: Does the contractor’s fleet support production between 50 and 500 tph, and can they demonstrate it at your specific requirement?
  • Plant availability commitment: What uptime guarantee is formalised in the contract?
  • Wear parts and maintenance approach: Who holds stock, and what are the actual lead times for key components?
  • Operator qualifications and supervision: Are operators formally trained and MHSA compliant?
  • Sector and geography track record: Can the contractor demonstrate comparable project delivery in your material type and operating environment?
  • Mobilisation capability: What is the realistic timeline from contract award to first production on your site?
  • B-BBEE standing: Does the contractor’s verified status support your procurement and transformation requirements?

B&E International: Contract Crushing Across Gauteng and South Africa

B&E International, a member of the Raubex Group (JSE: RBX), delivers integrated crushing and screening solutions to mining, quarrying, and construction operations across Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Limpopo, and throughout Southern Africa.

Operating from our Kempton Park base on the East Rand, our teams deploy crushing and screening plants across the 50 to 500 tph range, configured to your material specification, product requirement, and project timeline. Our operators are qualified, our maintenance programmes are structured, and our production reporting is transparent.

We carry the plant. We carry the technical expertise. Your operation carries the output.

Speak to Our Technical Team Before You Commit

If you are evaluating contract crushing against plant ownership for an upcoming project, the time to have that conversation is before capital decisions are made.

Our team will assess your throughput requirements, project timeline, and material specification, and provide an honest evaluation of what each model will cost your operation in practice.